Read, read, read. Read everything - trash, classics, good and bad, and see how they do it. Just like a carpenter who works as an apprentice and studies the master. Read! You'll absorb it. Then write. If it is good, you'll find out. If it is not, throw it out the window.
-
William Faulkner
About / Biography
Resume
Contact
Journal / Blog
Recommended Reading
Reviews
View Adam Kahtava's profile
Recent entries
Categories
.NET
AJAX
ASP.NET
ASP.NET AJAX
BarCamp
Book
C++
Calgary
Career News
Code Camp
Community
Contest
CSharp
CSS
dasBlog
DOM
Events
Firebug
Firefox
greasemonkey
IE
Interview
JavaScript
Links
Musings
Opera
Ottawa
Personal
Programming Languages
Quality Assurance
Review
Software
Team Work
TechNet
Themes and Skins
Toronto
Unit Testing
Videos
XML
Archives
September, 2008 (1)
August, 2008 (2)
July, 2008 (4)
June, 2008 (7)
May, 2008 (6)
April, 2008 (8)
March, 2008 (7)
February, 2008 (3)
January, 2008 (1)
December, 2007 (1)
November, 2007 (2)
October, 2007 (1)
September, 2007 (3)
July, 2007 (1)
May, 2007 (3)
April, 2007 (4)
March, 2007 (4)
February, 2007 (5)
January, 2007 (3)
December, 2006 (1)
November, 2006 (5)
October, 2006 (6)
September, 2006 (8)
August, 2006 (2)
July, 2006 (8)
June, 2006 (9)
May, 2006 (1)
Syndicate this site
Sign In
powered by
dasBlog
Journal / Blog
Monday, May 07, 2007
Notes on "The Hidden Cost of Turnover" from "Peopleware: Productivity Projects and Teams"
Notes about employee retention from
"Peopleware"
by Tom DeMarco & Timothy Lister and
"The Best Software Writing I"
by Joel Spolsky.
In the mid 80's DeMarco and Lister found that the
"average employee longevity [was] from fifteen to thirty-six months"
, that's about one to three years, and that the
"total cost of replacing each person is the equivalent to four-and-a-half to five months"
. Joel Spolsky in
The Best Software Writing I
, mentions that
"Recruiting and training a new employee is usually estimated to cost 12 months' salary, total."
Joel goes on to say that the industry standard for turnover is somewhere around 5%. So accordingly, if you worked at a company with 100 people you'd normally expect to loose 5 employees every year. Anything above 5% and you're probably working in an environment with high turnover.
DeMarco and Lister point out that, companies with low employee retention rates often enter into a cycle with negative financial implications and
"an ugly invisible cost"
, because
"turnover [produces] turnover"
.
This
"ugly invisible cost"
often manifests itself as:
Short-term viewpoints, a passing through mentality, degraded moral
Inexperienced management, early promotion, a top heavy organizational structure
A feeling of disposability, workers are treated as interchangeable parts, a degraded sense of loyalty
An undesirable work environment
A low employee retention rate
And the cycle continues
Musings
|
Software
PermaLink
|
Digg It
|
Del.icio.us
|
Comments [0]
Related posts:
Thoughts on Blogging: "Turn Up The Good, Turn Down The Suck"
More on Naming Conventions: My Naming Heuristics
Cross Language Naming Conventions: Avoiding Verbosity In The Presentation Layer
The World is Messy and Complex: Why Should Software Be Different?
Gross Generalizations: Software Evangelists, Rock Star Developers, Senior Developers, and Software Architects
2008 Summer Reading List: What Are You Reading?
Comments are closed.
Page rendered at Friday, September 05, 2008 8:29:35 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Disclaimer & Copyright
© 2008
Adam Kahtava
(
Adam.Kahtava.com
/
AdamDotCom.com
)
:: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:29:35 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)